Cervical Cancer in Gay Men

Crazy, isn’t it? We have so many issues with this story, not least the most obvious. Gay Men have cervices? Since when?

Not so long ago, an article was published from The BBC that states in Wales in the UK, gay men are to be given an HPV vaccine. The reason for this jab is that ‘vaccination can offer protection against other types of cancer commonly seen in gay men.’

First things first though. What is the primary use of the HPV vaccine? According to the CDC, Human Papillomavirus is a combination of 150 viruses (so one shot cures all?) and is ‘the most common sexually transmitted infection in The United States’.

Can you see the first issue we have? Since when did STI’s get linked to cancer? Cancer is not transmitted, is it? As far as we are aware, and no we are not specialists, Cancer is not a sexually transmitted infection:

‘Having an STD/STI increases a person’s risk for several types of cancer. Certain high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) can cause cervical cancer in women. In men, HPV infection can lead to the development of penile cancers. HPV also can cause cancers of the mouth, throat, and anus in both sexes. Acquiring viral hepatitis B or C puts a person at risk for liver cancer, and untreated HIV/AIDS increases risk for several types of rare cancers, including lymphomas, sarcomas, and cervical cancer.’

Well, learn something new every day. It ‘increases’ the risk. As does smoking, drinking, eating crap and apparently ‘not being lucky’ (we kid you not):

Two-thirds of cancers are due to “bad luck,” study finds

“Cancer-free longevity in people exposed to cancer-causing agents, such as tobacco, is often attributed to their ‘good genes,’ but the truth is that most of them simply had good luck,” added Vogelstein, who is also co-director of the Ludwig Center at Johns Hopkins and an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

CBS News

In a previous article, we asked just how far down the stupid path are we going to go?

Who are the targeted ‘audience’ for the HPV vaccine?

HPV Vaccine Recommendations

Either HPV vaccine is routinely recommended for 11- or 12-year-old girls. Quadrivalent HPV vaccine is routinely recommended for 11- or 12-year-old boys. The vaccine series can be started beginning at age 9 years. Vaccination is also recommended for 13- through 26-year-old females and 13- through 21-year-old males who have not completed the vaccine series.

Quadrivalent HPV vaccine may be given to 22- through 26-year-old males. Vaccination is routinely recommended for both men who have sex with men (MSM) and immuno-compromised persons aged 22 through 26 years. Vaccination with either the bivalent HPV vaccine or the quadrivalent vaccine is recommended for protection against HPV types 16 and 18, for the prevention of cervical cancers and precancers in females. Vaccination with the quadrivalent HPV vaccine is recommended for protection against HPV types 16, 18, 6 and 11, for the prevention of cervical, vulvar, vaginal cancers and precancerous cells in females, as well as anal cancers and precancers and genital warts in both females and males.

Ideally, patients should be vaccinated before onset of sexual activity, when they may be exposed to HPV. Patients who have been infected with one or more HPV types still get protection from the vaccine types they have not acquired.

HPV vaccines can be given to the following:

  • Lactating women.
  • Patients with minor acute illnesses, such as diarrhea or mild upper respiratory tract infections, with or without fever.
  • Women who have had an equivocal or abnormal Pap test, a positive HPV test, or genital warts. However, these patients should be advised that data do not indicate that the vaccine will have any therapeutic effect on existing Pap test abnormalities, HPV infection or genital warts.
  • Patients who are immunocompromised, either from infection, disease or medication. However, the immune response to vaccination and vaccine efficacy might be less in immunocompromised people.’

Staying with the CDC for a moment, the website also says ‘that in most cases HPV will go away on its own and does not cause  any health problems, but when HPV does not go away, it can cause health problems like genital warts and cancer’.

What sort of cancer and how? Well, according to the National Cancer Institute only ‘HPV types 16 and 18 are responsible for about 70% of all cases’ and that ‘type 16 causes about 95% of all anal cancer’ .

First the CDC say there are 150 viruses that make up the HPV vaccine and the National Cancer Institute say it’s 200. Wikipedia says it is 170. There is another issue, but to keep it neat, let’s meet in the middle and look at some Wiki ‘facts’:

HPV chart

How many gay men get cancer directly from HPV? Well, according to Cancer Network ‘Each year anal cancer is diagnosed in about two people in every 100,000 in the general population’. However gay men are ’20 times more likely to be diagnosed…’ making that making that 80 cases per 100,000.

So there are the facts of the issue. That is the most serious side of things however, we want to look at the remaining 148, 168 or 198  types of HPV viruses that are contained with that vaccine. We think you know where we are going with this. Vaccines are good, right? The same painkiller can stop all sorts of different pain, but not at the same time and that’s why you have to buy ones that are in different packages correct?

Okay, so now to flip this particular coin. In May 2015, this happened:

New Study: HPV Vaccine ‘Increases Chance’ of Developing Other HPV Strains

Research presented at the 2015 annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research has shown that women who were vaccinated against HPV had a higher risk of developing non-vaccine strains of the virus.

Even more telling, unvaccinated women had lower rates of the non-vaccine, high-risk strains of HPV, which tells you that, just as Natural Society reported, the human papillomavirus isn’t likely to affect you if you aren’t vaccinated, and there are real dangers associated with Merck’s vaccine.

Dr. Diane Harper, who helped develop Gardasil, said to attendees of the Fourth International Public Conference on Vaccination: “Gardasil is largely unnecessary, and it has never been fully tested on females under the age of 15 …[there`s] little need for the vaccine”

Though the US FDA has given Gardasil the green light more than once, researchers at the University of British Columbia showed that the vaccine’s effectiveness was not only overstated (through the use of selective reporting or “cherry picking” data), but was also unproven.

For example, the claim that HPV vaccination will result in approximately 70% reduction of cervical cancers is made despite the fact that the clinical trials data have not demonstrated to date that the vaccines have actually prevented a single case of cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer death), nor that the current overly optimistic surrogate marker-based extrapolations are justified.Likewise, the notion that HPV vaccines have an impressive safety profile is only supported by highly flawed design of safety trials and is contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccination to serious adverse outcomes (including death and permanent disabilities).’

Read more: Natural Society

So, even before they decided to start using the HPV virus on gay men, the person who ‘helped develop Gardasil’ admits that it is ‘largely unnecessary’. They even produced ‘flawed’ data to suggest it can reduce cancer. Imagine that. But it goes back even further than this. In 2011, 5 years ago, Natural Society published this article:

The Gardasil Timeline | A History of Corruption and Negative Reactions

The HPV shot Gardasil has a history that is not only filled with adverse reactions and death, but also political corruption. In fact, many are completely unaware as to what extent Gardasil was pushed on the public using bribery, omission of numerical facts, and complete lies. With so much news coming out on the Gardasil vaccine, it is a challenge to keep up with the documentation. Without seeing the recent history of Gardasil, you simply cannot put together all of the pieces. The Gardasil timeline unveils how Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, is working behind the scenes to put profits over the health of you and your family.

The evidence linking Gardasil to adverse reactions and death was available long before legislators began pushing it on pre-pubescent children. Shockingly, the HPV shot led to 3,589 harmful reactions and 16 deaths between May 2009 and September 2010 alone. Of the 3,589 adverse reactions, many were debilitating. Permanent disability was the result of 213 cases; 25 resulted in the diagnosis of Guillain-Barre Syndrome; there were 789 other “serious” reports according to FDA documents.

If we had known about it, we would have said it’s not a good idea,” said Jon Abramson, the former chairman of the CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practice”.

Read more: Natural Society

Jon Abramson clearly said If we had known about it, we would have said it’s not a good idea,”. The proof of the pudding is in the eating my friend. You know about it now and what have you done? Well, just 2 years after this statement, they did this:

California Legislators Push for Gardasil Bill, Found to be Bribed by Merck

In August 2011, Assembly Bill 499 was proposed by California Assembly Member Tony Atkins. The bill allows for children as young as 12 to receive the HPV shot Gardasil without any parental consent, thus completely removing parents from the important decision of whether or not to receive the death-linked HPV shot.

Read more: Natural Society

That sounds about right. You prove that it is ‘dangerous’ and that it has led to many deaths in adult females, so what do you do? You give it to children instead.

The Future of Gardasil: In Your Hands

A government advisory committee is now requesting that the CDC recommend Gardasil for boys between the ages of 11 and 12, expanding the current recommendation that only pertains to girls. As Gardasil is given to young children in California under the guise of a necessary and safe  method of HPV  prevention, it is important that the truth about Gardasil is shared with consumers. With enough proverbial force behind it, the anti-Gardasil movement can not only challenge the Gardasil law, but educate the masses to such a degree that they will not be receiving it regardless of legislation.

Educate your children, friends, family, and complete strangers about the dangers of Gardasil.

Read more: Natural Society

This Facebook video is currently doing the rounds:

Girls Carmen de Bolivar, district caracoli with disorders that come vaccine Pots warned in written or technical records. syncope tonic clonic movements. . . In this population volunteer doctors neurologists # # # CARDIOLOGOS addresses this population is completely neglected by the health system. the story of the person who shot this video shows the anguish 👀 eyes of the world turn exists in this population see leaders who make the decision to continue with the application of this vaccine either # Gardasil or Cervarix # . How can this keep happening? . Do not understand how the interest is clearly not the protection of underage girls is violating their right to healthy, full of his age. WHERE IS THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, UNICEF, Volten and look at the reality of more than 40mil victims. WORLDWIDE. It is no coincidence ALL GIRLS AND HEALTHY LIVES WITH DISABILITIES IN ORDER TO BRING THEIR VACCINE COTIDIANOS.DESPUES DAYS. HPV MEXICO # # # # # Further NO VACCINE PAPILOMA # # # FOR HUMAN. 3RD WEEK VACCINATION 6 to 10 OCTUBTE AROUND THE COUNTRY. CHECK OUT WHAT IS HAPPENING IN COLOMBIA AND IN MANY COUNTRIES MEXICO be calculated automatically. IF YOUR DAUGHTER …. ??? NO MORE RUSSIAN ROULETTE. The images are real and speak for themselves.

This was in September 2015.

Thomas Edison once said ‘I speak without exaggeration when I say that I have constructed 3,000 different theories in connection with the electric light, each one of them reasonable and apparently likely to be true. Yet only in two cases did my experiments prove the truth of my theory’. To us, this is exactly the same thing. The HPV not only rarely works, but the side effects are so extreme as to cause death and paralysis, yet still they are pushing for it to be used.

It didn’t work in adult females, so they started using it on prepubescent girls. That was not great, so they tried it on boys too. That still didn’t work so now they are pushing it onto gay men. Do you ever get the feeling they are thinking ‘we know this works, we just have to find out who it works best on’? Exactly like Edison. The sad thing is though, Edison wasn’t causing harm to others, and he did some great stuff. I doubt the inventor of Gardasil is going to get a Nobel prize, but then again, looking at the numpties who DO get one, you never know.

Before we conclude this article, let’s have a sneaky peek at Merck and CSL Ltd:

Merck and CSL Limited are expected to market Gardasil as a cancer vaccine, rather than an STD vaccine. It remains unclear how widespread the use of the three-shot series will be, in part because of its $525 list price ($175 each for three shots).

Studies using different pharmacoeconomic models predict that vaccinating young women with Gardasil in combination with screening programs may be more cost effective than screening alone. These results have been important in decisions by many countries to start vaccination programs. For example, the Canadian government approved $300 million to buy the HPV vaccine in 2008 after deciding from studies that the vaccine would be cost-effective especially by immunizing young women. Marc Steben, an investigator for the vaccine, wrote that the financial burden of HPV related cancers on the Canadian people was already $300 million per year in 2005, so the vaccine could reduce this burden and be cost-effective.

Since penile and anal cancers are much less common than cervical cancer, HPV vaccination of young men is likely to be much less cost-effective than for young women.

CSL’s vaccine for Swine Flu was approved in September 2009 for use in Australia by people aged 10 and over. The federal government ordered 21 million doses of vaccine for 2009 A/H1N1 of which 8 million were manufactured by CSL. The Australian government intended to use the CSL Vaccine in one of the largest national vaccine programs in the country’s history.
In October 2014, Novartis announced its intention to sell its influenza vaccine business including its development pipeline, to CSL for $275 million. CSL merged it into its bioCSL operation. In November 2015, BioCSL rebranded the combined business with Novartis Influenza Vaccines as Seqirus creating the worlds 2nd largest Influenza Vaccine company.


And there is the truth of it.

‘…market Gardasil as a cancer vaccine, rather than an STD vaccine’.

‘…vaccinating young women’…’ may be more cost-effective than screening alone’.

‘ HPV vaccination of young men is likely to be much less cost-effective than for young women.’

Just one more thing. It has recently been suggested that cancer is a contagion:

Scientists Ponder the Prospect of Contagious Cancer

If nothing else can stop a tumor’s mad evolution, the cancer ultimately dies with its host. Everything the malignant cells have learned about outwitting the patient’s defenses — and those of the oncologists — is erased. The next case of cancer, in another victim, must start anew.

A 19-year-old laboratory worker who pricked herself with a syringe of colon cancer cells developed a tumor in her hand. A surgeon acquired a cancer from his patient after accidentally cutting himself during an operation. There are also cases of malignant cells being transferred from one person to another through an organ transplant or from a woman to her fetus.

NY Times

So the answer to the question, why do gay men need a cervical cancer drug for a STD that ‘in most cases will go away on it’s own’ is quite simple, because it makes more money for the manufacturers. Plain and simple. And if those gay men die from this ‘vaccine’ or even die from the same cancer the STD vaccine ‘immunized’ them to? Well, at least they won’t sue.

What do you think?

Drop us a line at:


Or leave us a message in the comments below.

Post Categories: Conspiracy, Health & Wellbeing, Politics, Truth, Un-natural Disasters
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: